Logo
Logo
Logo
Cart

No Products in the cart.

Challenges in qualifiying welding procedures for superduplex steel S32760

Jun 09, 2025 AKILAN RAJU 43
Adventure Sports

CHALLENGES IN QUALIFIYING WELDING PROCEDURES FOR SUPERDUPLEX STEEL S32760

Most of the Middle East clients specify ASTM A 923 method C corrosion  requirements for the welding procedure qualification of SDSS S32760 grade. However, ASTM A 923 specifies the corrosion requirement for base materials (Solution annealed condition) and not for S32760 grade. Many organizations failed to meet the corrosion requirement by accepting the material of construction as S32760 without knowing its metallurgical and corrosion properties of this specific grade. The challenges to overcome and the selection of appropriate MOC based on their application are narrated in detail in this case study.


During the engineering stage, the organization had selected SDSS S32760 material as MOC (Vessel thickness is 10mm) based on their design basis (Sour service). The organization has qualified welding procedures with various parameters but could not pass the corrosion testing of the ASTM A 923 method C. Upon investigation, it was found that a lack of experience personnel w.r.t. selected material was the prime reason for the failures of PQR corrosion testing.

 

Based on general practises of exotic materials, initially trials were carried out with shielding gas of 99.999% Argon, interpass of 90°C and heat input 1.55KJ/mm. Corrosion properties inline with A 923 method were not met and not even closer to acceptance range (10mdd at test temp 40° c).Procured materials like pipe, flange  & cap end were supplied in solution annealed condition and were corrosion requirements.International consumable manufactures have been consulted to guarantee the corrosion properties for S32760, unfortunately none of them provided the guarantee.

 

Testing and Analysis

 

Girth welds must be of the welding process GTAW manual and are one of the bottlenecks of fabrication.About 10 trails were carried and tested for mechanical, chemical (including PREN) and corrosion properties. Ferrite count (35-60%) were tested in accordance with ASTM E 562 along with metallography study for any intermetallic precipitates. Below various combinations were part of the trials and modified to stringent requirements to meet the corrosion criteria.

 

·         Increase of travel speed especially for root & coldpass

·         Change of shielding & backing gas from Argon to Ar+2% N2

·         Interpass temperature from 90° C to 50°c

·         Restricting heat input for Root and coldpass

·         Highest cleaning practices in handling base material, consumable and fabrication tools

 

At last, best practices of super duplex were implemented in order to meet the corrosion criteria. Even after that, organization has found that the corrosion results were not consistent with the trails. One of the NACE article (paper 8838) has clearly states that it is difficult for SDSS to pass corrosion test of A 923 method C and is not repeatable.

 

All purchased welded pipes of S32760 were meeting the corrosion requirements of A 923 method C. On comparing,we found that that the rootcause for the failures.

• Process used for welded pipes were mechanized process, whereas organziation had utilized manual GTAW process.Travel speed was higher in case of welded pipes than the manual welding process
•   The welded pipes were undergone solution annealing heat treatment, whereas girth weld had not undergone any heat treatment.


The root pass is difficult to be welded with travel speed of 65 mm minimum by a manual

craftmen. Compared to SS 316L, fluidity of weld pool is less for SDSS materials. Base material is difficult to fuse. More over minimum 65 mm travel speed, the welders were not able to fuse base materials properly, resulted in lack of fusion and undercut defects. Organization has put tremendous effort to train to achieve the travel speed during vessel fabrication. However, organization has selected S32750 Grade and were able to meet all chemical, mechanical, ferrite and corrosion requirements, while following general practices of exotic requirements as shown below

·         Travel speed of 45mm/min for rootpass

·         Shielding & backing gas Ar+2% N2

·         Interpass temperature 100° C 

·         Heat input for Root (0.6-1.2 kj/mm) and coldpass (0.5-0.9 Kj/mm)

·         Filler metal of 1.6,2.0 & 2.4 mm

 

Conclusion: 

 

S32760 may not be recommended for the fabrication to suit this corrosion requirement, whereas S32750 would be ideal to meet both fabrication and technical requirements. Many recommend accepting S32760 grade with a corrosion requirement inline with an international standard ISO 17781. Acceptance criteria is 4.0g/m2 at test temperature of 35°c which is less stringent than A 923 method C.

 

 

Recommendations

 

Corrosion criteria can be achieved ,if Grade S32760 meets below recommendations during welding procedure qualification.

 

 

1.      Travel speed to be maintained 65 mm/minute minimum in root pass welding

2.      Travel speed cold pass should be higher than the root pass. The value may range from 100-125mm 

3.      Shielding and backing gas Ar+2%N2 would be the best

4.      Interpass to 50°C is highly recommended due to low thickness

5.      Oxygen content limit to 500 ppm during back purging

6.      Heat input shall be limited to 0.6-0.9 Kj/mm and cold pass to 0.52-0.86 Kj/mm

7.      Filler metal shall be 2.0 mm dia for Root and 2.4 for cold, fill & cap passes

8.      Competent craftmen shall be utilized

9.      Control of repairs such as Lack of fusion and undercut due to higher travel speed of 65mm/Min minimum

 

References

 

ASTM A 923: Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels

 

ISO 17741 : Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Test methods for quality control of microstructure of ferritic/austenitic (duplex) stainless steels

NACE Article: The Validity of Using the ASTM A923 Test Method C Corrosion Test for Weld Procedure Qualification of 25% Chrome Duplex Stainless Steels

ASTM E 562: Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count.


 

During the engineering stage, the organization had selected SDSS S32760 material as MOC (Vessel thickness is 10mm) based on their design basis (Sour service). The organization has qualified welding procedures with various parameters but could not pass the corrosion testing of the ASTM A 923 method C. Upon investigation, it was found that a lack of experience personnel w.r.t. selected material was the prime reason for the failures of PQR corrosion testing.

 

Based on general practises of exotic materials, initially trials were carried out with shielding gas of 99.999% Argon, interpass of 90°C and heat input 1.55KJ/mm. Corrosion properties inline with A 923 method were not met and not even closer to acceptance range (10mdd at test temp 40° c).Procured materials like pipe, flange  & cap end were supplied in solution annealed condition and were corrosion requirements.International consumable manufactures have been consulted to guarantee the corrosion properties for S32760, unfortunately none of them provided the guarantee.

 

Testing and Analysis

 

Girth welds must be of the welding process GTAW manual and are one of the bottlenecks of fabrication.About 10 trails were carried and tested for mechanical, chemical (including PREN) and corrosion properties. Ferrite count (35-60%) were tested in accordance with ASTM E 562 along with metallography study for any intermetallic precipitates. Below various combinations were part of the trials and modified to stringent requirements to meet the corrosion criteria.

 

·         Increase of travel speed especially for root & coldpass

·         Change of shielding & backing gas from Argon to Ar+2% N2

·         Interpass temperature from 90° C to 50°c

·         Restricting heat input for Root and coldpass

·         Highest cleaning practices in handling base material, consumable and fabrication tools

 

At last, best practices of super duplex were implemented in order to meet the corrosion criteria. Even after that, organization has found that the corrosion results were not consistent with the trails. One of the NACE article (paper 8838) has clearly states that it is difficult for SDSS to pass corrosion test of A 923 method C and is not repeatable.

 

All purchased welded pipes of S32760 were meeting the corrosion requirements of A 923 method C. On comparing,we found that that the rootcause for the failures.

• Process used for welded pipes were mechanized process, whereas organziation had utilized manual GTAW process.Travel speed was higher in case of welded pipes than the manual welding process
•   The welded pipes were undergone solution annealing heat treatment, whereas girth weld had not undergone any heat treatment.


The root pass is difficult to be welded with travel speed of 65 mm minimum by a manual

craftmen. Compared to SS 316L, fluidity of weld pool is less for SDSS materials. Base material is difficult to fuse. More over minimum 65 mm travel speed, the welders were not able to fuse base materials properly, resulted in lack of fusion and undercut defects. Organization has put tremendous effort to train to achieve the travel speed during vessel fabrication. However, organization has selected S32750 Grade and were able to meet all chemical, mechanical, ferrite and corrosion requirements, while following general practices of exotic requirements as shown below

·         Travel speed of 45mm/min for rootpass

·         Shielding & backing gas Ar+2% N2

·         Interpass temperature 100° C 

·         Heat input for Root (0.6-1.2 kj/mm) and coldpass (0.5-0.9 Kj/mm)

·         Filler metal of 1.6,2.0 & 2.4 mm

 

Conclusion: 

 

S32760 may not be recommended for the fabrication to suit this corrosion requirement, whereas S32750 would be ideal to meet both fabrication and technical requirements. Many recommend accepting S32760 grade with a corrosion requirement inline with an international standard ISO 17781. Acceptance criteria is 4.0g/m2 at test temperature of 35°c which is less stringent than A 923 method C.

 

 

Recommendations

 

Corrosion criteria can be achieved ,if Grade S32760 meets below recommendations during welding procedure qualification.

 

 

1.      Travel speed to be maintained 65 mm/minute minimum in root pass welding

2.      Travel speed cold pass should be higher than the root pass. The value may range from 100-125mm 

3.      Shielding and backing gas Ar+2%N2 would be the best

4.      Interpass to 50°C is highly recommended due to low thickness

5.      Oxygen content limit to 500 ppm during back purging

6.      Heat input shall be limited to 0.6-0.9 Kj/mm and cold pass to 0.52-0.86 Kj/mm

7.      Filler metal shall be 2.0 mm dia for Root and 2.4 for cold, fill & cap passes

8.      Competent craftmen shall be utilized

9.      Control of repairs such as Lack of fusion and undercut due to higher travel speed of 65mm/Min minimum

 

References

 

ASTM A 923: Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels

 

ISO 17741 : Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Test methods for quality control of microstructure of ferritic/austenitic (duplex) stainless steels

NACE Article: The Validity of Using the ASTM A923 Test Method C Corrosion Test for Weld Procedure Qualification of 25% Chrome Duplex Stainless Steels

ASTM E 562: Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count.


 

#toolbar=0&scrollbar=0&view=fit" type="application/pdf" width="800px" height="1200vh" style="border: none; background-color: #fff; overflow: hidden;"> -->
Author Image

AKILAN RAJU

metallurgist working with Mcdermott, Dubai Chartered Engineer and holds MSc degree in welding engineering, Cranfield university, UK He is a professional member of IIW india & TWI, UK. 25 years industrial experience in materials, welding and quality.

Keep Up to Date
with the Most Important News

By clicking the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Add a Comment

Magazine Preview

Recommended for You

During the engineering stage, the organization had selected SDSS S32760 material as MOC (Vessel thickness is 10mm) based on their design basis (Sour service). The organization has qualified welding procedures with various parameters but could not pass the corrosion testing of the ASTM A 923 method C. Upon investigation, it was found that a lack of experience personnel w.r.t. selected material was the prime reason for the failures of PQR corrosion testing.

 

Based on general practises of exotic materials, initially trials were carried out with shielding gas of 99.999% Argon, interpass of 90°C and heat input 1.55KJ/mm. Corrosion properties inline with A 923 method were not met and not even closer to acceptance range (10mdd at test temp 40° c).Procured materials like pipe, flange  & cap end were supplied in solution annealed condition and were corrosion requirements.International consumable manufactures have been consulted to guarantee the corrosion properties for S32760, unfortunately none of them provided the guarantee.

 

Testing and Analysis

 

Girth welds must be of the welding process GTAW manual and are one of the bottlenecks of fabrication.About 10 trails were carried and tested for mechanical, chemical (including PREN) and corrosion properties. Ferrite count (35-60%) were tested in accordance with ASTM E 562 along with metallography study for any intermetallic precipitates. Below various combinations were part of the trials and modified to stringent requirements to meet the corrosion criteria.

 

·         Increase of travel speed especially for root & coldpass

·         Change of shielding & backing gas from Argon to Ar+2% N2

·         Interpass temperature from 90° C to 50°c

·         Restricting heat input for Root and coldpass

·         Highest cleaning practices in handling base material, consumable and fabrication tools

 

At last, best practices of super duplex were implemented in order to meet the corrosion criteria. Even after that, organization has found that the corrosion results were not consistent with the trails. One of the NACE article (paper 8838) has clearly states that it is difficult for SDSS to pass corrosion test of A 923 method C and is not repeatable.

 

All purchased welded pipes of S32760 were meeting the corrosion requirements of A 923 method C. On comparing,we found that that the rootcause for the failures.

• Process used for welded pipes were mechanized process, whereas organziation had utilized manual GTAW process.Travel speed was higher in case of welded pipes than the manual welding process
•   The welded pipes were undergone solution annealing heat treatment, whereas girth weld had not undergone any heat treatment.


The root pass is difficult to be welded with travel speed of 65 mm minimum by a manual

craftmen. Compared to SS 316L, fluidity of weld pool is less for SDSS materials. Base material is difficult to fuse. More over minimum 65 mm travel speed, the welders were not able to fuse base materials properly, resulted in lack of fusion and undercut defects. Organization has put tremendous effort to train to achieve the travel speed during vessel fabrication. However, organization has selected S32750 Grade and were able to meet all chemical, mechanical, ferrite and corrosion requirements, while following general practices of exotic requirements as shown below

·         Travel speed of 45mm/min for rootpass

·         Shielding & backing gas Ar+2% N2

·         Interpass temperature 100° C 

·         Heat input for Root (0.6-1.2 kj/mm) and coldpass (0.5-0.9 Kj/mm)

·         Filler metal of 1.6,2.0 & 2.4 mm

 

Conclusion: 

 

S32760 may not be recommended for the fabrication to suit this corrosion requirement, whereas S32750 would be ideal to meet both fabrication and technical requirements. Many recommend accepting S32760 grade with a corrosion requirement inline with an international standard ISO 17781. Acceptance criteria is 4.0g/m2 at test temperature of 35°c which is less stringent than A 923 method C.

 

 

Recommendations

 

Corrosion criteria can be achieved ,if Grade S32760 meets below recommendations during welding procedure qualification.

 

 

1.      Travel speed to be maintained 65 mm/minute minimum in root pass welding

2.      Travel speed cold pass should be higher than the root pass. The value may range from 100-125mm 

3.      Shielding and backing gas Ar+2%N2 would be the best

4.      Interpass to 50°C is highly recommended due to low thickness

5.      Oxygen content limit to 500 ppm during back purging

6.      Heat input shall be limited to 0.6-0.9 Kj/mm and cold pass to 0.52-0.86 Kj/mm

7.      Filler metal shall be 2.0 mm dia for Root and 2.4 for cold, fill & cap passes

8.      Competent craftmen shall be utilized

9.      Control of repairs such as Lack of fusion and undercut due to higher travel speed of 65mm/Min minimum

 

References

 

ASTM A 923: Standard Test Methods for Detecting Detrimental Intermetallic Phase in Duplex Austenitic/Ferritic Stainless Steels

 

ISO 17741 : Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Test methods for quality control of microstructure of ferritic/austenitic (duplex) stainless steels

NACE Article: The Validity of Using the ASTM A923 Test Method C Corrosion Test for Weld Procedure Qualification of 25% Chrome Duplex Stainless Steels

ASTM E 562: Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count.


 

"; const pdfContainer = document.getElementById('pdf-container'); const loadingEl = document.getElementById('loading'); const errorMessageEl = document.getElementById('error-message'); const errorTextEl = document.getElementById('error-text'); // Initialize PDF.js pdfjsLib.GlobalWorkerOptions.workerSrc = 'https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/pdf.js/2.10.377/pdf.worker.min.js'; // Function to show error function showError(message) { loadingEl.classList.add('hidden'); errorTextEl.textContent = message; errorMessageEl.classList.remove('hidden'); } // Load and render PDF async function loadPdf() { try { if (!pdfUrl || pdfUrl === "undefined" || pdfUrl === "") { throw new Error("Invalid PDF URL"); } console.log("Loading PDF from:", pdfUrl); const pdfDoc = await pdfjsLib.getDocument(pdfUrl).promise; console.log("PDF loaded successfully. Pages:", pdfDoc.numPages); // Set fixed width in pixels const fixedWidth = 850; // You can adjust this value as needed for (let pageNum = 1; pageNum <= pdfDoc.numPages; pageNum++) { const page = await pdfDoc.getPage(pageNum); // Calculate scale based on fixed width const originalViewport = page.getViewport({ scale: 1 }); const fixedScale = fixedWidth / originalViewport.width; const viewport = page.getViewport({ scale: fixedScale }); const pageDiv = document.createElement('div'); pageDiv.className = 'mx-auto my-1 pdf-page-container'; const canvas = document.createElement('canvas'); canvas.className = 'mx-auto'; pageDiv.appendChild(canvas); const context = canvas.getContext('2d'); const outputScale = window.devicePixelRatio || 1; canvas.width = Math.floor(viewport.width * outputScale); canvas.height = Math.floor(viewport.height * outputScale); canvas.style.width = `${viewport.width}px`; canvas.style.height = `${viewport.height}px`; const renderContext = { canvasContext: context, viewport: viewport, transform: [outputScale, 0, 0, outputScale, 0, 0] }; await page.render(renderContext).promise; pdfContainer.appendChild(pageDiv); console.log("Rendered page", pageNum); } loadingEl.classList.add('hidden'); } catch (error) { console.error('Error loading or rendering PDF:', error); showError(error.message || 'Unable to load the PDF. Please try again later.'); } } document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', loadPdf); -->

Enquiry Form